Malicious, vindictive Gildred in Catch and Kill Matrimonial Infidelity and Wife Carolina Gildred
They both agree to eliminate Michael Foster instead of accepting the truth.
It's clear that Tom Gildred and his wife, Carolina Gildred, did not stop at
their "catch and kill" scheme to cover up an infidelity. Their vindictive
appeals, attempting to cover up the BEA breach of contract and destroy Michael
Foster's trademarks and business URLs is a narrative of personal vendetta. with
judge louis nock in new york is added layer of vindictive, Gildred personal
drama unprovoked at the expense of hoping to see Michael Foster become mentally
insane or to come after them in a mentally insane manner. The public perception
is right about Gildred used his influence and resources to manipulate the legal
system and media to his abusive advantage, which has only fueled more
controversy and suspicion around his actions.Rafkin ESQ Jennifer Bogue with Seth Rafkin to Honor Lynn & Phil Gildred wishes.
The
Gildred Duo - Mad CPA/Doctors
of San Diego
are Lawyers Also
Malicious, vindictive Gildred in Catch and Kill Matrimonial Infidelity with Wife Carolina Gildred are two peas in a pod.
This MAD Rancho Santa Fe couple took the non-conventional pathway to solving extra-marital affair between wife and lover Michael Foster.
Using Money, A corrupt attorney Seth Rafkin, Jennifer Bogue Gildred created headlines in an expensive 5 years harassment campaign.
Michael Foster
For no less than
7 years I suffer from emotional distresses at the hand of the Gildred Family of San Diego California and it's Evil Money. They entered into my life
obtusely without knocking or any advance given notice.
The public's belief that Tom Gildred defamed Michael Foster and
engaged in abuse of power, along with corruption influencing judges, stems
from several key points and facts:
-
Allegations of Fraudulent Inducement: Gildred
is accused of fraudulently inducing Foster into a business agreement by
misrepresenting the terms and conditions. This includes allegations that
Gildred promised Foster a 25% lifetime stake in the business, which
Foster claims was never honored.
-
Unjust Enrichment: Foster alleges that Gildred
and his associates unjustly enriched themselves at Foster's expense by
using their positions to harm Foster's quality of life and business
interests.
-
Trademark Infringement: Foster claims that
Gildred and his associates used their influence to infringe on Foster's
trademarks, causing financial harm and damage to Foster's reputation.
-
Judicial Corruption: There are ongoing investigations into alleged bribery involving New York Supreme Court Judge Louis Levi Nock, who is accused of holding Foster by his necktie
and demanding that Foster sign a settlement agreement. This has raised
concerns about judicial corruption and the influence of Gildred's power
and money in the legal proceedings
-
Public Opinion and Media Coverage: The case
has received significant media attention, with reports highlighting the
alleged misconduct and corruption. This has fueled public opinion against Gildred and
increased scrutiny of the legal system's handling of the case.
These factors have contributed to the public's belief that Gildred defamed Foster and engaged in abuse of power, along with corruption
influencing judges
